WIN

WIN 040

WIN 040 150 150 Ben Coker Strategies


A Bit Risky?

You and I live in a society obsessed with ‘risk’.

There are a few definitions of risk which seem to boil down to some sort of measurement of the potential result of some type of interaction with uncertainty.

In other words, if we don’t know what’s going to happen next, then the situation is uncertain, so entering into it presents a ‘risk’ relating to how things might turn out.

For good or for bad.

Usually people think of risk as something to do with the possibility of something ‘bad’ happening – except perhaps in gambling when the ‘risk’ of an investment is usually related to a win – ‘how much are we prepared to risk?’

All this talk of risk of course works to undermine the belief that you and I have in what we are doing or what we are about to do or what we want to do.

‘Taking a risk’ implies not that things might go wrong but that things are likely to go wrong and a whole industry has built up for ‘experts’ to measure or ‘assess’ the chances of an enterprise succeeding – or not.

There’s not a lot that you and I can do these days without someone having done or having to do a ‘risk assessment’ before we are permitted to move forward.

But here’s the thing

If you and I are committed to what we are engaged in and we fully believe and have faith in it, then there is no ‘risk’.

You and I think in terms of intentions and outcomes and we know that the means by which we achieve what we intend may differ from what we originally envisaged, and often change as we go along our chosen path.

Risk is about the fear that things might ‘go wrong’ or get ‘out of control’, so risk is also about control.

About keeping everything under control or feeling ‘in control’ of what is going on.

But you and I aren’t like that.

Formula 1 champion Lewis Hamilton said –

“If everything feels under control, then you’re not going fast enough”

Hamilton knows the risks involved in his sport and that sets limits to the ‘zone’ in which he can operate during a race.

But the important thing is that his belief and commitment is such that despite any ‘risks’ he isn’t going to slow down when the opportunity to overtake someone presents itself.

For sure, sometimes it doesn’t work out as expected, but the opportunity was taken – despite the ‘risk’.

You see

Risks are not ‘real’ – they are just a guess, or maybe sometimes a ‘calculation’ about the outcome of a particular action and whether that outcome will be ‘good’ or ‘bad’ for the person taking the action.

You and I know many people who are ‘risk averse’. In other words, they are reluctant to take action because they are convinced that the likelihood of ‘something going wrong’ is greater that the outcome they might desire from taking that action.

They have gone from simple ‘fear of the unknown’ to a level of certainty that ‘the unknown’ (or any form of ‘change’) is generally speaking a bad thing – so they do nothing.

But isn’t that a ‘risk’ as well?

‘Do nothing’ is often seen as a ‘safe option’ – but sometimes it can be just as ‘risky or even more so than doing something different in certain situations.

So every ‘risk’ has a ‘counter risk’ – what is the risk of not taking that risk?

And what is the risk of not bothering about the risk and just ‘getting on with it’.

I’ll go with Sir Richard Branson’s maxim of “Screw it, Let’s do it” any day and let the ‘risks’ look after themselves!

I’m off to take action and ‘take some risks’.

You too?

WIN 039

WIN 039 150 150 Ben Coker Strategies


“We’re  Gonna Win”

Remember Cassius Clay/Mohammed Ali?

He always said “I am the Greatest” – well before he won the heavyweight boxing championship. No-one challenged this statement, no-one else said “No you’re not, I am” – at least, not at first . . .

So he won – it was inevitable.

There was never any doubt in his mind that something ‘might go wrong’, and no thoughts like ‘it’s not the best conditions for us’ or ‘someone else is better than me right now’ that you and I hear from so many sports people from time to time.

You and I can see it in their eyes when they’re interviewed before the event and we just know they aren’t going to win.

This was never the case with Ali – until someone came along who had an even stronger conviction that he was going knock him on the floor of the ring.

And there are some top business people who think the same way; there’s no concept of ‘failure’ when they start a new project. The same is true of some political and military leaders – the prospect of not succeeding doesn’t exist.

The trouble is, that unless you and I operate in a close knit team who think the same way and are, like a sports team, pursuing the same goals, things can start to go wrong when ‘other people’ get involved as is often necessary if our projects are going to come to fruition.

The thing is . . .

‘Other people’ often don’t think the same way as you and I. Even though they may ‘sign up’ to whatever you and I are proposing, they often don’t fully come on board.

Often within an organization, you and I hear that some people are not given the ‘full story’, they don’t know what the end result of their involvement is envisaged to be, they don’t know – usually because someone thinks that “they don’t need to know” – what the real goal is for the project in hand.

Very often you and I need ‘other people’ (outside our ‘family’ team) to help in our endeavor, because we and our core team can’t do everything and the success of the project needs more hands to the pump.

Time and time again I’ve heard people being told “just focus on your bit and everything will work out fine”; and sometimes even “you don’t need to know why you’re doing this, just get on with it”.

They are thus denied knowledge of the ultimate goal and the opportunity to buy into it. They are denied the right to embrace the goal, to understand the purpose of the endeavor, and to be ‘part’ of the outcome.

But what if people (usually ‘employers’) who need others to ensure the success of their enterprise, did, as you and I would, fully share the ‘why’ and fully share the vision they have of the end result?

What if they empowered their ‘people’ with the reason and the vision and thus gave them the ability to think positively, know where they were going and know that together, even as a really large ‘team’ pursuing the same goal, they would be invincible?

There are a lot of great companies and corporations around the world who do this, as there are a lot of ‘smaller’ operations who do likewise.

It’s not a cast iron guarantee of success because the more people who are involved the more likely it is for the ‘nay-sayers’ to sneak in. But it’s the best shot you and I and anyone else involved in any sort of enterprise can have.

And as individuals (like Mohammed Ali) you and I must do the same.

Know our reasons, know our goals, know our targets, know that we can ‘win’.

That’s ‘know’ not ‘think’ remember?

There’s a great song by Bryan Adams on the album ‘18 til’ I die’ – “We’re gonna win”.

Try it out if ever you have one of those days when your ‘dark side’ is whining on about things going wrong and trying to persuade you that you’re wasting your time.

And when that happens as you and I are well aware, suppress that sneaky negativity with clear thoughts and affirmations like “I am the greatest”, “I am the winner” and “I am (now) (whatever the purpose of my quest happens to be)”.

Go on, just say it . . .

WIN 038

WIN 038 150 150 Ben Coker Strategies


Feel the Fear

“Feel the fear and do it anyway.”

So wrote Susan Jeffers in her book of the same name.

Fear is a very basic human instinct. Without it we wouldn’t survive.

Fear is there to protect us from predatory animals and to keep us safe in the cave when the storms are raging.

Fear is there to help us out when we’re in a precarious situation. To slow us down, or speed us up when the forces of nature are not in our favour.

But now, you and I rarely have to cope with an attack by a predatory animal and are not often faced by real threats from nature.

The vast majority of the fears that you and I have come from within us . . .but how did they get there?

Many people have a fear of, and indeed may be terrified by, the idea of ‘speaking in public’ or even making a speech or presentation to a small group of people who they know.

Even worse for some is the ‘fear’ of making phone calls, particularly in a sales environment.

It is said that these fears are in fact a result of an underlying ‘fear of rejection’ by other people.

Again may people have ‘phobias’ or fears of many types of harmless animal, fear of being ‘outside’, fear of being ‘inside’, and some people have fears of certain inanimate objects that can do them no harm whatsoever in a physical sense.

Another common problem is the ‘fear of change’ fear of things being different at some time in the future from what they are now.

It seems that everyone suffers from one of more of these irrational or non-instinctive fears – and that includes you and I, doesn’t it?

For you and I probably the most common ‘fear’ we experience is that some new idea we are trying out isn’t going to work or that things aren’t going to turn out the way that we planned.

You and I always have some doubts, however committed and positive we are. There’s always a possibility that something will ‘go wrong’, isn’t there?

Of course there is – but only when you and I allow those doubts and fears to ‘take hold’.

The thing is that ‘out there’ most people are surrounded by an aura of negativity. (Especially in the UK I’m sorry to say).

You and I see this all the time. In the media, on the ‘news’, even in the advertising messages we find ourselves subjected to more often than we’d like.

Criticism of what people do, ‘taking people down a peg’ when they’ve has some success, focusing on the negative aspects of any change being proposed and general away motivation or making people feel inadequate in mass media advertising.

It goes on all the time . . .

“You can’t do that”. “I told you it wouldn’t work”. You should have done (or not done) this or that. “It’ll never work”. “It’ll all go horribly wrong”. “I told you so”.

And even if people do well there’s always someone in the crowd moaning that they could or should have done better.

And then there are those who actually create fears.

They warn you and I about the ‘fear of failure’ or the ‘fear of rejection’.

There are even people who run courses about coping with these fears; which they probably created in the first place simply by raising the idea that you or I would ‘fail’ or would get ‘rejected’.

It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

You see . . .

The fears that you and I have within us are not ours. We’ve taken them on board from other people; we’ve been persuaded that we should have these fears.

Why?

Because of their fears – their fears that you or I might just succeed in what we are doing. That we might just ‘overtake’ them in their imagined hierarchy of life the universe and everything.

Their fears that somehow, even if you and I are operating in a totally different environment or sphere of activity from them; you and I might be ‘better’ than them.

So what can you and I do about it?

As Susan Jeffers says – “feel the fear”, which means recognise that somehow we have taken those irrational fears on board, recognise them for what they are – irrational and irrelevant.

Disown and dismiss the fears, and whatever it is that you and I are doing – “do it anyway”.

Have a courageous week.

WIN 037

WIN 037 150 150 Ben Coker Strategies


Up The Garden Path . . .

Are your goals leading you ‘up the garden path’?

In the wrong direction?

Are you actually doing what you need to do and thinking what you need to think in order to achieve your ultimate vision or dream of what you want to be, do and have in your life – what you would love your life to be?

Or are you taking actions to achieve short term goals – which may seem important and may seem to be contributing to the ultimate vision but . . .

Are leading you on a detour –

on a ‘short cut’ (and you and I know what that usually means!) –

up a blind alley?

Or are they taking you in totally the wrong direction?

I hope not.

The thing is . . .

You and I know how to set goals, to set targets, to put plans in place, and to take action.

But what if . . .

Some of those goals aren’t consistent with the visions that you and I have of how and who we really want to be?

Here’s the thing.

Sometimes ‘stuff’ just has to be done. Sometimes things just have to be ‘got out of the way’. Sometimes you and I just have to divest ourselves of things, situations and ideas we are dragging around with us.

There’s a parable about a group of golfers who set out to play a round one morning. On reaching the third tee, one of the four, Harry, had a heart attack and died. Many, many hours later the four returned to the clubhouse and were asked where on earth they had been all this time.

They explained it had taken such a long time because every time they hit the ball they had to drag Harry around the course with them until they’d completed the game.

Are you ‘dragging Harry’.

Are the goals you are working towards being delayed because you really need to adjust your plan and do something differently rather than just pushing on regardless dragging a burden with you?

The problem is though . . .

That when you and I do that, when you and I perhaps do retrace our steps and let go of whatever is holding us up – that becomes another goal.

Distracting us from what we were wanting to achieve in the first place.

And if you and I are not very careful this ‘detour’ can easily spawn yet another ‘distraction goal’ leading us toward who knows where.

Certainly not where you and I were intending to go in the first place!

You know why ‘big’ projects are usually late and over budget? Because the same thing is happening – distraction and ‘scope creep’. Things just keep on cropping up that seem to need to be done before real progress can be made.

Questions are the answer.

So when you and I are working towards our goals and visions we need to stop from time to time and check the map, turn on the satnav (well maybe not, who knows where that might take us!), and make sure we are going in the right direction and following the best route.

Especially when we’ve had to take Harry back to the clubhouse before continuing the round.

Especially when we’ve been delayed in our journey through no fault of our own.

And especially when you and I are tempted by ‘bright shiny objects’ in the form of new ideas or new ‘stuff’ that we think we just must have.

Is this ‘new goal’ consistent with what you and I want to be, do and have? Is it consistent with what you and I would love our lives to be?

I’m asking, are you?

Have an interesting week.

WIN 036

WIN 036 150 150 Ben Coker Strategies


How’s Your Earth-Suit?

There’s a continuing theme in many Science Fiction books and movies about aliens who, when exploring (or invading) other worlds, wear, not a protective ‘space suit’, but some sort of functional ‘bio-suit’.

Usually, as in the movie ‘Independence Day’, this is depicted as an external bio-body inside which is another, rather different looking physical entity.

Sometimes authors have depicted the inhabitant of the bio-suit as a non-corporeal being. This idea appears in ‘Star Trek’ a few times but was more often described by earlier SF writers.

Taking this one step further, authors have depicted a non-corporeal entity inhabiting a human body, and frequently, energy based ‘entities’ or aliens ‘taking over’ humans to obtain physical form.

In one of the ‘Stargate SG1’ series episodes, one of the key players, Dr. Daniel Jackson, dies and as he does so an amorphous light energy entity leaves his body and ‘ascends’.

It reappears in the form of Daniel Jackson in a scene in an American style ‘Diner’ reminiscent of Douglas Adams’ ‘Restaurant at the End of the Universe’.

It seems that these ideas, when safely contained within the Science Fiction genre, are acceptable and quite ‘OK’ as a concept.

The idea also appears in the Bible. The Christian belief is that this actually happened to Jesus of Nazareth but this is strongly contested by other religions whose beliefs are based on the same sources. Islam has a different interpretation, but still sees Jesus Son of Mary as their most important religious figure after Mohammed.

But the thing is – that outside the SF and religious context anyone who promotes the idea that human beings might just all be non-corporeal beings or ‘aliens’ wearing a multifunctional ‘Earth-Suit’ is considered to be at least ‘crazy’ if not a dangerous lunatic.

And some people can’t accept the Christian fundamental belief that Jesus ‘ascended’ – and this even includes some ‘Christians’.

Remember – this is a belief, not a fact. There’s no ‘proof’. The belief is based on faith.

But what if it were true?

What if, inside you and I, and everyone else, there is a non-corporeal, energy based, living entity using an ‘earth-suit’ to enable a physical presence on the planet.

Some, or even most, people will immediately dismiss such an idea as pure nonsense and refuse to take any further part in the discussion – but more about that another time.

But you and I, being open minded, will go along with this ‘what if . . .’ scenario.

Because there is some merit to it.

We know that the Universe is made up entirely of energy. All substance, all matter, consists of molecules and atoms which now appear to be simply ‘formations’ of energy.

And that includes us, you and I.

We’re just formations of energy.

So there’s no reason why we couldn’t be composed of a conscious energetic entity using a formation of energy around it to create a physical form – or body.

You and I talk about ‘soul’, about ‘heart’ and about ‘mind’. But these have no physical form.

If a human body is dissected there’s no ‘soul’ there. The ‘mind’ cannot be cut out of the brain, and the ‘heart’ or ‘spirit’ which binds all our feelings together is not the organ that pumps blood around the body.

Physically none of these ‘things’ exist – but they are there, aren’t they?

No-one really knows what happens when our physical body breaks down and ‘dies’.

What happens to the soul, the mind and all those feelings?

Where do they go?

I don’t subscribe to the idea that they just ‘stop’ as some people believe. What do you think?

In most cultures and religions there is a strong concept of an ‘afterlife’, whether that be going to ‘heaven’ (in all its various forms) or simply ‘joining the ancestors’.

But the thing is

Why do our earth-suits break down? Why do you and I die?

Surely if we are powerful energetic entities inhabiting these suits then we’d ‘live’ longer – or why not forever?

But maybe that isn’t our life-cycle.

Perhaps we are similar to the insects and other ‘lower’ forms of life’ that adopt different forms during their life-cycle. Perhaps we also ‘move on’ when the time is right for us all to ‘ascend’ to a higher level.

I’ve seen a number of dead bodies in my time and the one thing that struck me about all of them was that something was ‘missing’, something had ‘gone’ from them. Perhaps those bodies of family members were just their empty suits.

Which means of course that those souls, minds and spirits are still ‘out there’, somewhere.

But in the meantime

What you and I don’t know is when we will be ‘ready’ to ascend.

Perhaps we need to make sure that we look after our earth suits to make sure they don’t ‘break down’ on us before ‘we’ are ready to go.

I’m off to check out my life support system.

How about you?

WIN 035

WIN 035 150 150 Ben Coker Strategies


Whose Idea Was That?

There’s a quote –

“Everything is created twice, first in the mind and then in reality”

which has been attributed to a number of authors including Steven Covey and Robin Sharma in the current era.

However, in the latter half of the nineteenth century the ‘New Thought’ (‘new’ thought is now over 200 years old now by the way) writer Wallace Wattles in his book ‘The Science of Getting Rich’ wrote:

“There is a thinking stuff from which all things are made, and which in its original state, permeates, penetrates, and fills the interspaces of the universe.

A thought, in this substance, produces the thing that is imaged by the thought.

Man can form things in his thought, and, by impressing his thought upon formless substance, can cause the thing he thinks about to be created.”

This is probably the modern origin of this thinking, although there are probably precedents in Greco-Roman philosophy.

(There usually are – to most things that people think up ‘today’)

Now let’s you and I examine this.

I had the idea (on Monday) to write something about this concept. Today I’m writing, or ‘creating’ it. But before I started to write, I had already created the idea.

Back in the late 60’s, Gene Roddenberry, the ‘creator’ of Start Trek’ had the idea to create what has become a massive TV and Film franchise. He created it (twice) and other people have gone on to extend the implementation of his idea.

Roddenberry was also probably responsible for the creation of the mobile phone – remember that flip-open ‘communicator’ used in the first series?

Nothing remotely like that existed at the time, but now everyone has one, or two – or even something not too far off the tri-corder measuring and detecting device – it’s amazing what some ‘smart phones’ can do now.

I just wish someone would hurry up and get the ‘transporter’ into production!

But getting back to Wallace Wattles.

The concept is that you and I think up an ‘idea’ or in other words ‘create’ something in our minds.

Then we put it into practice and create something ‘physical’.

An object, a written work, a piece of music, an artwork, a process, a speech, a seminar – the list is endless.

So you and I create ‘it’ twice.

The thing is . . .

Where did that ‘idea’ come from?

“There is a thinking stuff from which all things are made” says Wallace before he goes on to say that this ‘stuff’ pervades the Universe.

Some people call this the ‘infinite presence’ others may call it ‘God’ (known by many names) or ‘the Force’ and other descriptions which I apologise for omitting.

There are only a few people who absolutely deny even the possibility of the existence of an intelligence outside or beyond humanity.

You see

It’s quite a common occurrence that two or more people will ‘get’ the ‘same’ idea at around the same time.

This often leads to accusations of plagiarism or copying, even theft, of ideas.

Yes, that does exist – and I’ve marked enough student assignments to know that for sure!

But probably more often than not, and more often that you and I are aware, two or more people will bring the same idea into creation around the same time.

Usually the outcomes, or ‘products’ of their creative process aren’t quite the same but they may serve the same purpose.

My theory, shared with many others, is that these ‘ideas’ are received (from the ‘thinking stuff’) by several people around the word at the same time.

An ‘insurance policy’ taken out by the ‘ultimate creator’ to make sure that someone will put that idea into practice, even though it may take some time.

So I don’t think it’s twice but three times (or in older language – thrice) that everything is created.

But

‘Stuff’ doesn’t just happen.

You and I need to act on those ideas that we gratefully receive, and we need to act quickly.

The responsibility for putting ‘our’ ideas into practice is yours and mine – and the bonus for acting is that you and I, not the ‘universe’, get the ‘credit!

How good is that?

So next time you get a ‘great idea’ just crack on and do it – before someone else does; because you can be sure that ‘someone else’ has been given the idea too.

I’m off to take action.

You too?

WIN 034

WIN 034 150 150 Ben Coker Strategies


Brave Thinking

You know that ‘voice’ inside your head?

You know, the one who never stops ‘talking’.

Well the thing is . . . and this may be a bit scary –

There are a whole bunch of them, continuously debating.

What’s right and what’s not right, what to do next and what not to do, why and why not. ‘Oh no you can’t’, ‘Oh yes you can’, and so on . . . and on.

The trouble is.

They all sound the same, they all sound like your voice, they all claim to be you.

You and I are constantly besieged by doubts and fears, by hopes and longings, by likes and dislikes and by what we ‘think’ we can do and what we ‘think’ we can’t do.

And a whole lot more – going on all the time.

So how do you and I make ‘sense’ of all this – because if we didn’t we’d cease to function effectively.

Most people think there is just one voice and some people call this a ‘conscience’ or the voice that keeps them ‘on track’; stops them doing things they shouldn’t do.

Many people have a concept of two voices. A ‘good cop, bad cop’ mentality where one voice argues for what is ‘good’ and the other for what is not; in whatever context is relevant at the time.

But unlike a parliamentary debate, there’s no vote. It’s a one on one contest, neither ‘voice’ can ‘win’ and if this were the case you or I would never be able to make a decision.

But people do, because they are ‘trained’ to make decisions not based on real thought, but purely on circumstances.

So there has to be a third party, a third voice; but one with the power to decide, one with the ability to dismiss or accept what the others are saying.

One voice to take you and I forward.

But often, most people, including you and I, don’t use this voice to its full potential.

You see . . .

The tendency is to make decisions rapidly, for ideas to crop up followed by a ‘quick discussion’ in the head and a course of action taken.

Usually one of three:

  • Do nothing
  • Go back and check out all the detail (continue the debate), or
  • ‘Just do it’.

Sometimes what you and I decide to do works out well, sometimes it doesn’t, and sometimes things remain pretty much the same.

Here’s where you and I need to exercise ‘Brave Thinking’*.

There are three steps:

First of all, you and I must develop the ability to ‘observe’ – as the ‘third voice’, what is actually going on.

In our minds, step back and recognize what we are feeling and what stimuli are acting upon us, notice what we are noticing and what we are thinking (what those other two voices are ‘saying’) – and do it actively.

Ask ‘who is it in me that can notice my body but is not my body, who is it in me that can notice my thoughts?’ and actively ‘listen’ to what those voices are saying.

And, pay attention to the ideas that come to you. They come to your ‘third’ voice, let it hold the idea while the other two discuss it, and beware of what they throw up – obligations, fears, insecurities, paradigms and conventions.

The second element of brave thinking is to notice, pay attention to and contrast your longings and your discontents. Keep these in mind while the debate is going on and make sure that the decision you (the third mind) make is consistent with these.

But remember – to take a step is a risk, not to take a step may be an even greater risk.

Successful people take risks because they are consistent with their longings or discontents

Thirdly keep in mind your vision of what you would love to be, do and have.

If you could be, do or have anything what would you love?

Build a vision you are in love with and build your relationship with that vision.

Factor this into your brave thinking, your observation of what is going on in your mind, the influences acting upon you and the circumstances in which you find yourself

Make your decisions accordingly.

Think bravely and have a great week.

*’Brave Thinking’ is an idea developed by Mary Morrissey

WIN 033

WIN 033 150 150 Ben Coker Strategies


The Brules of Life

In his latest book, ‘The Code of the Extraordinary Mind’, Vishen Lhakiani explains his concept of ‘brules’.

Brules he says, are ‘BS-rules’ that exist in the ‘culturescape’ in which you and I find ourselves and that people adopt to simplify their understanding of the world.

The ‘culturescape’ is his word for the cultural landscape, and like real landscapes different culturescapes can be found in different parts of the world.

The people who live in these different culturescapes have invented millions of ‘rules’ or conventions that govern the way they live, operate and co-exist.

Some of these conventions/rules are quite sensible, like everyone driving on a particular side of the road according to the direction in which they are travelling – even though different countries apply this in different ways and in some countries it doesn’t seem to apply at all!

The reason why a particular side of the road was chosen in the first place was probably a brule, but it has now become (in most places) a quite acceptable rule.

Sometimes it’s happened the other way round. Long ago in various cultures it was considered that certain animals were ‘unclean’ and must not be eaten. At the time this was a sensible rule as these animals carried parasites which infected the human body if the meat was eaten.

Perhaps this idea of certain animals being unclean has now become a ‘brule’ although in some culturescapes there may be other reasons why it has not.

One can look at ‘laws’ in much the same way.

There are real ‘physical’ laws like the law of gravity and the other ‘laws of physics’ that cannot be broken – even in Star Trek.

Current research shows that these laws may not yet be fully understood but in most cases they have been proven to be true and to ‘work’.

‘Human’ laws are a different matter.

Within each culturescape laws are written by people – but not by you and I and not by ‘ordinary’ people.

Laws are written by people who represent vested interests and people who wish to maintain an established power base, or build one.

True, some laws are in the best interests of the population – the ‘criminal’ laws that are intended to prevent people harming each other in various ways.

They don’t always stop it happening, but people will face some form of official retribution or punishment if they are found to be breaking these laws.

Other laws are much more dubious in their provenance and are usually enacted to reinforce the brules.

You and I inhabit a culturescape or society that is governed by brules.

The education brules: you must get good qualifications to guarantee success.

The work brules: you must get a ‘good job’ with a good employer and sell your time for money. You must work ‘hard’ to guarantee success.

The leisure brules: You can only enjoy yourself and do what you want to do when you’re not ‘working’.

The loyalty brules: You should adhere to a single religion. You should adhere to and adopt the views of a single political party.

And so on . .  . and on . . . and on . . .

Lhakiani cites five key ways in which you and I take on all these brules:

Young children take on ideas from their parents and are thus indoctrinated into their brules.

Brules are promoted by authority figures such as celebrities, business leaders and politicians. Fear based politics is a classic example of ‘brule-building’.

People (but maybe not you and I) take on brules because they feel the need to ‘belong’ to a group or ‘tribe’. An extreme example of this is ‘gang culture’.

The media, advertising, ‘reality’ TV and so on create a sort of social proof that encourages people to take on more brules, many of which, especially those that come from mass media advertising, are totally wrong and misleading.

Everyone (including you and I) have internal insecurities and limiting beliefs. Thinking ‘you can’t do that’ is simply the result of responding to a brule.

You and I have taken on board a lot of brules.

The thing is – what influence do they have on our view of the world and the culturescape in which we live?

It’s summed up neatly by Obi-Wan Kenobi in Star Wars:

“You will find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view

Who’s more foolish, the fool? Or the fool who follows him”

You see

You and I need to question the brules we have inadvertently or unconsciously adopted – and this is Lhakiani’s ‘Law #2

“Extraordinary minds question the brules when they feel those brules are out of alignment with their dreams and desires. They recognize that much of the way the world works is due to people blindly following the brules that have long passed their expiration date.”

I’m off to ask some questions.

And you?

Have a questioning week.

WIN 032

WIN 032 150 150 Ben Coker Strategies


State of Independence

In 1988, Dean Kamen, the inventor of the Segway, declared a new independent nation state.
The Kingdom of North Dumpling
After consulting an expert on constitutional law, Kamen found a means for the island he owns and where he lives, just off the coast of Connecticut, to secede from the USA.
He created his own island nation with its own constitution, anthem, flag, and currency (the Dumpling of course). He even persuaded President George H W Bush to sign a non-aggression pact with North Dumpling.
All this arose because the State of New York who administered the island refused permission for a wind turbine on the grounds that it would be too noisy and disturb the neighbours – even though Kamen is the only resident of the island, a mile offshore in Fishers Island Sound.

But the thing is . . .
Although Kamen generates all his own energy to power the house and the lighthouse he’s not really independent.
To actually be independent the island would have to be entirely self sufficient, not dependent of anyone else for anything.
You and I like to think of ourselves as ‘independent’ but it all depends on what we mean by independence.
Most people would say that being independent means not being controlled by anyone, not being told what they can and cannot do or when they are allowed or not allowed to do things.
At a national level it’s usually more about being subject to laws, regulations and especially taxes in one form or another imposed by a colonial power, organization of states, or as in Kamen’s case a State or Federal government.
In 1776 the United States itself declared its independence from the United Kingdom because its citizens, many of whom had originally come from the UK, no longer desired to live by the ‘rules’ imposed by Britain.
In all examples of independence there is always some level of dependence.
The USA would never have got off the ground were it not for its dependence on trade with the UK and other countries.
Neither would the other former British colonies who remained significantly dependent on the UK for some time after gaining their ‘independence’ from British ‘rule’ in the middle of the 20th century.
In fact, after independence a slightly different relationship usually comes into being – co-dependence, where the parties concerned become dependent and reliant on each other for the maintenance of their way of life.
You see . . .
There’s really no such thing as ‘independence’.
Although you and I think and act for ourselves we still depend on one another for many things and many reasons.
You and I make our own decisions, but these are still dependent on the circumstances and environment in which they are made.
You or I would probably think long and hard about moving permanently to an island that didn’t have a broadband connection for example, because most of us depend on having that facility.
Unless we are willing to cut ourselves off from the rest of the world and are able to do this in such a way that we will be entirely self-sufficient to cater for all our needs and wants, then ‘independence’ is a myth.
Some people might find this rather disappointing. They thought they were ‘in charge’ of their own lives but forget that their lifestyle depends on many things outside their control.
But the truth is that we are all co-dependent. You and I depend on other people.
We may or may not have a relationship with them, we may not even know who they are. We depend on people all over the world to turn up for work to produce the products and services on which we depend.
And sometimes . . .
You and I gain a higher level of independence by depending more on other people.
In order to achieve our goals to do the things that we do best or like to do we have to depend on others to do the things that we could do ourselves but get in the way of what we want to do.

WIN 031

WIN 031 150 150 Ben Coker Strategies


Opportunity Knocks . . .

Occasionally you and I are faced with something unexpected.
It could be a change in environment, a change in circumstances, or something that happened in a way that we didn’t expect.
It’s often a change, the consequences of which are unclear or uncertain and you and I know that such lack of clarity usually leads to resistance to whatever has happened.
You see . . .
There are three ways in which most people choose to deal with this sort of thing.
‘Keep Calm and Carry On’ – stick head firmly in the sand – “la la la la la nothing’s happening, if I ignore it it’ll go away”.
Many people will just go into denial, and sometimes, if it’s a small or unimportant change, this may not matter, but usually the consequence is that people who do this take a few steps backwards in their lives.
The psychologist Viktor Frankl theorized that in unexpected circumstances people react in one of two ways.
It either brings out the best in them or it brings out the worst in them.
Or in other words they will either react positively or negatively.
It’s a sad fact that in Western society at least, the tendency is for most people to react negatively.
(Which I suppose includes ‘doing nothing’.)
Even if whatever change occurred was something they expected or of which they were in favour.
Most people, encouraged by the media and politicians and so-called ‘experts’ look for and focus on the ‘downside’.
And then there are the recriminations. ‘Someone’ or some group of people have to be ‘responsible’ for what happened, ‘someone’ has to be blamed, ‘someone’ has to go.
Most people, worshipping at the altar of negativity, persuade themselves that after all that has changed, whatever it was, their lives will be poorer or less rosy, they will be worse off, everything they were used to will collapse in a heap – and so on.
“Depressing isn’t it?” as Marvin the paranoid android in Douglas Adams’ ‘Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy’ was very fond of saying.
But here’s the thing.
You and I, you and I, react positively to change.
Even if we don’t ‘like’ it, even if it wasn’t what we ‘wanted’, and even if the outcome is unclear or uncertain.
You and I see each of these things, these ‘happenings’ as an opportunity.
Sir Richard Branson said:
“If somebody offers you an amazing opportunity but you are not sure you can do it, say yes – then learn how to do it later!”
You and I don’t need to be offered opportunities (although it’s nice if we are), you and I can make opportunities out of these unexpected changes that occur to our circumstances or environment.
We may not be quite sure what they are and we may not be quite sure how to take advantage of the situation.
We may not know exactly what to do to make things happen.
But we know that we can.
You and I know that if we proceed we will find a way, you and I know that there is some good in it for ourselves and for others, you and I know that there are two sides to the coin.
The bright side and the dark side.
The bright side of the coin is shining out with opportunities for everyone.
To find new ways of doing things, to do different things, and to do things that we couldn’t do before because the old circumstances didn’t allow it.
On the dark side in the ‘doom and gloom’ the opportunity is nowhere, on the bright side the opportunity is now here.
Always look on the bright side!